President Pervez Musharraf must be harbouring bitter-sweet feelings about the latest ruling from
President Musharraf survived partly thanks to the international political conjuncture. Ironically when the World Trade Centre was crumbling on 9/11/2001 to the horror of the world, Pt Musharraf saw his star rising as the
Pt Musharraf has been lucky in ruling
Musharraf can be a charismatic leader but ex-Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto can be more charismatic if she has better messages to sell to the disenchanted. Maybe her “alliance” with Musharraf will cost her her credibility making her look as a politician seeking just power without caring to make power return solely in the hands in the civilians who can be elected by having people behind them and not the military. There will be something looking amiss in Pakistani politics as long ex-prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is set aside, making him the next challenger or the current trouble maker through his supporters.
President Musharraf was lucky to keep in power for 8 years, a record by Pakistani standards. He should set the record by returning the country to full democracy. The military ethics won’t allow him to use fraud to stay in power. Either losing or winning through democratic elections he will be at least credited with saving the country from complete chaos, should all political tendencies use their bases for an all out confrontation, to the dismay of the USA for which Pakistan (a nuclear power and a strong base of Muslim fundamentalists) should be kept stable at all costs even if it comes to persuade Musharraf to leave power under the pretext of presidential elections.
4 comments:
Good post Abdelilah,
I think that the Pakistani people are the main looser in this murky equation
Thanks Hisham for the comment.
It's queer that Musharraf was re-elected while his case is still hanging at the Supreme Court. The vote was just a formality as the Pakistani people weren't consulted in the first place.
You're spot on!
And did you see the utter hypocrisy of the western governments about this story. While they bombarded the media (فرعو لنا دماغنا) with highbrow declarations on Burma(where there is a real problem... I'm not questionning that) shedding crocodile tears about the banned protesters (did you hear a word Abdelilah about an antiwar demonstration which will take place tomorrow in London and which the police didn't allow to converge towards Paliament Square and which the BBC has totally ignored), they just turned there heads away from Pakistan where a stooge dictator (who owns nuclear weapons by the way) is clinging to power at the expense of his own people's will and more importantly at the expense of world peace.
Hi Hisham, The protest are being covered by the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/7032604.stm
As for the elections in Pakistan, in politics what matters are interests, not principles. Burma is portrayed as a dictatorship openly by the USA because its military is allied to China. All is a question of political equation.
Post a Comment